We have been away from our friends and family in HK for a few months now. Indeed in the 21st century it doesn't mean that we have been disconnected at all. I found that the communication pattern (at least with some of our friends and family members) have not been changed. We chatted in IM from time to time, we visited each other blogs, we emailed for details, and we called each other once in a while. The changes of the 21st century, however, is not about technology. Thus, for those who could provide a communication service wins the world.
First, it was some figures about Facebook that drew my attention...

... then it was the real experience in connectivity. I have joined for a day and I am learning something really simple but perhaps true in the world we are living in.

One simple rule of the
game,
initiate connection with people and help people to connect with
you.
Try it yourself!

Few more thoughts about the Facebook experience...
A year before, when I was working with some of the young people from high school. They introduced Friendster to me. They told me this Friendster platform would soon connect the whole world together. However, when I learned the concept behind Friendster, I really had no motivation in trying... Until a few weeks ago, I chatted with a friend working in the IT industry; he told me that more people are using Facebook instead of Friendster now. After some exploration of Facebook, I think most people would agree with me that it has similar functionality and concept as Friendster.
Why would people choose to abandon a network that almost connected the whole world, and weave another communication web?
Perhaps the network is consisted of multiple communication channels. Unlike the fax machine and telephone, you can only choose to use one method at a time, given that one communication channel is for only one communication device. But people nowadays can communicate the same content with multiple of communication channels simultaneously without adding any extra cost of tangible resources. The implication is twofold, first it implies that no communication platforms should exist independently. The seamless compatibility between communication platforms indeed had driven competitors to develop partnership together. Second, these end-users will only generate content which can be used across different platforms. In other words, they wouldn't innovate anything in the closed platform.
Another assumption is that both Friendster and Facebook have no distinct direction to generate values for its community to act or make things happen. The power of these communites are the connectivity. It also fulfill the basic need of humanity - the need to belong; the need to be significant. When people reached their connectivity limit and couldn't capture the knowledge that has been generated from the network, the momentum within the community died out quickly. Since, the required force to move a humongous wheel from a static position is excessive. Hence, a newer and smaller wheel might have the niche to collect just enough energy to slowly move forward.
Back in the 19th century, it was the railroad and train system that connected
people together and enabled the postal service and long distance traveling.
The communication system then assisted people to develop
operation, economy, political model, management, family structure,
culture, laws, philosophy... And it was during the 19th century...
When we compare the communication network nowadays with the
communication network during the industrial revolution, we notice that
we are only in the stage where the communication system has been
developed. We are living in the transitional period
where everything is evolving, like the WEB2.0 world - we need to
rethink what is copyright, authorship, identity, ethics, aesthetics,
rhetoric, governance, privacy, commerce, love, family ...and ourselves. Soon these things will affect our real life... and the changes is yet to come.
"
in a few hundreds years, when the history of our time will be written from a long-term perspective, it is likely that the most important event historians will see is not technology. not the internet, not e-commerce. it is an unprecedented change in the human condition. For the first time -- literally -- substantial and rapidly growing numbers of people have choices. For the first time, they will have to manage themselves. And society is totally unprepared for it." Peter F. Drucker
Chatboard (0)